Visibility
Learning Goal 1e. Contrast horizontal visibility, vertical
visibility, and runway visual range (RVR), and discuss how they affect
aviation.
Aviation defines horizontal visibilities, vertical visibilities, and slant visibilities.
Suppose there is a thin layer of fog at an airport. A pilot flying
over the airport looking straight down (vertical visibility) or at a
nearly vertical angle (slant visibility) might be able to see the
runway, hangars, and other aircraft because only a relatively short
vertical distance along the line of sight is filled with fog droplets.
So the pilot might (mistakenly) think that it is safe to land. But as
the aircraft gets lower during its descent toward landing, the aircraft
will enter the fog. The pilot needs to look straight ahead (horizontal
visibility) to find the runway. But now, with both the aircraft and the
destination in the fog, the sight line is along a much longer path
through the fog, making it harder to see.
Slant visibility look down toward the town of
Ålesund, Norway, from a tall hill. Imagine trying to find an airport
and land in these conditions.
For this reason, horizontal visibilities are the ones measured and
reported at airports, because it is the one most relevant for safety. If
you hear the word "visibility" without any adjectives in front, then
assume it is a horizontal visibility.
Horizontal Visibility
Visibility is a measure of how far away you can see
a black object during daytime, or how far away you can
see a bright light at night. It is measured as a distance, e.g. the
visibility is 8 km. For Canadian aviation, visibility is
reported in statute miles over land, and nautical miles over the ocean.
US aviation uses statute miles. The World Meteorological
Organization
(WMO) recommends kilometres or metres.
If the visibility is poor (such as in hazy, foggy, cloudy, snowy,
volcanic ashy, dusty, sandy, or smoky/polluted air, see
Learning Goal 1i), then pilots will have difficulty seeing:
- the ground, for landmarks for navigation
- other aircraft or obstacles (such as tall towers), so they don't
hit them
- the horizon, to help them keep the plane flying level
- the runway at an airport, for landing
The time between when the pilot first sees an obstacle and when the
aircraft hits it depends on the visibility. Commercial airliners fly at roughly 300 knots (555 km/h) . If you
are flying in a much slower general-aviation (small) aircraft at 200 km/h, and if the visibility is 2 km, then the time
between when you first see an obstacle and when you hit it is (2 km) /
(200 km/h) = 0.01 hours = 36 seconds. OK, that should be enough time
for you to recognize the hazard, consider your options, and move the
aircraft controls to change its direction or altitude, and for the
aircraft to respond to your control inputs.
But suppose the visiblity is 0.5 km. Then you have only 9 seconds to
react (or even less time if you are in a faster aircraft) — not a lot
of time. Plus, consider this: pilots need to divide their attention
between looking out the window straight ahead, checking different
directions out the window, navigating (checking their charts and
navigation instruments onboard), checking the aircraft engine
instruments and fuel tanks, tuning their communications radio to
different frequencies, etc. So the pilot might not be looking out the
window when the obstacle first appears.
For this reason, visibility rules exist for flight safety. If
visibility is good and exceeds a certain threshold (a condition called
visual meteorological conditions, VMC), then the pilot is allowed to
fly under the Visual Flight Rules (VFR).
However, when visibility is
poor (instrument meteorological conditions, IMC), only
specially-trained pilots flying aircraft with special instruments can
fly, on instrument
flight rules (IFR), and following specific
directions given by air traffic control
(people on the ground with radar and other tracking methods such as GPS to make
sure you don't hit other aircraft, and can get where you want to go
without hitting any obstacles). See more info about VFR and IFR in Learning Goal 1g.
Measuring Visibility
Human observers often estimate visibility by trying to see landmarks
of known distances from the airport, such as tall towers, mountains,
trees, or smoke stacks. As viewed at eye level by an observer on the
ground, such as in the photo below.
Some automated instruments (called transmissometers)
shine an incident light beam across a known
path length (e.g. 250 feet), and measure how much dimmer the received
(transmitted*) light is compared to when the air is clean.
Other instruments measure how much light is scattered
(bounced off in all directions) from tiny particles (of dust, fog,
smoke, etc.) in the air.
Of these instruments, some detect forward-scattered
light, which is scattered light leaving the tiny particles in roughly
the same direction as the incoming (transmitted*) laser beam. Other
instruments measure how much is back-scattered,
roughly opposite to the incoming beam. Yet others measure how much is side-scattered, as sketched below.
Back-scatter
visibility meter |
|
Forward-scatter visibility meter |
|
Side-scatter (wide range of
angles) visibility meter |
|
Diagrams courtesy of the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO) Guide to
Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, WMO-No. 8
(2008 edition, updated in 2010), Part I, Chapter 9: Measurement of Visibility.
* The word "transmitted" is used in opposite ways in some of the
figures above. For the transmissometer, the transmitted light is the
dimmed light that is received at the detector. For the scattering
visibility meters, "transmitted" is the incident laser light that is
emitted from the laser, i.e. the transmitter refers to the light source.
Runway Visual Range (RVR)
For busy airports, sometimes these automated visibility sensors are
installed close to a runway to
measure runway visual range (RVR).
This indicates how far (in meters or feet) ahead a pilot can see horizontally along
a runway centerline. RVR is usually reported only when visibilities are
poor (i.e. less than about 2,000 m or less than 6,000 feet). RVR 2600
feet ≈ 0.5 statuate mile. RVR 1200 feet ≈ 0.25 statuate mile.
Vertical Visibility (VV)
In the diagram below, the top frame shows clouds (grey) and
non-cloudy air (blue). The height of the cloud base above ground
defines the ceiling altitude. In the bottom frame is an obscuration
(e.g. dust, smoke, fog, mist, etc., sketched as bluish grey) that
reduces visibility in all directions. In obscuration conditions (i.e.
an indefinite ceiling), the limit that you can see vertically is the
vertical visibility (VV), and is used instead of the normal ceiling
height.
Vertical visibility is determined by either:
- The distance that an observer can see vertically into an
indefinite ceiling;
- The height corresponding to the top of a ceiling light projector
beam;
- The height at which a ceiling balloon (a bright red balloon
filled
with helium) completely disappears during the presence of an indefinite
ceiling; or
- The height determined by the sensor algorithm at automated
stations (based on horizontal visibility).
CAUTION: It is
ambiguous (and wrong) to use the phrase "the atmosphere is clear" when
discussing visibility. Instead, for visibilities, use "visibility is
unlimited" or "visibility is OK", both of which mean the visibility is
10 km (6 statute miles) or greater. The phrase "clear skies" means no
clouds.
Keywords: air traffic control, back scatter,
forward scatter, horizontal visibility, runway visual range (RVR),
scatter, side scatter, slant visibility, transmissometer, vertical
visibility (VV), visibility, World Meteorological Organization (WMO),
instrument flight rules (IFR), visual flight rules (VFR), ceiling
Extra info for Experts; Not Needed for this
Course.
Image credits. All figures by Roland Stull, except
where otherwise noted.